Turnaround & Captial Projects

Turn Readiness
Gaps into the Team’s Next Action

Turnaround Orchestrator connects scope, planning, readiness and execution on top of the systems you already run.
Eos → Team Action
Illustrative Workflows

Before the freeze

Replaced last time. Needed this time?

01 · The scope question

E-01A’s bundle was replaced in the previous turnaround. Standby exchangers are available, and subsequent inspections show no new findings.

02 · The connected context

Eos brings maintenance history and inspection findings together with Inclusion Factor reasoning to surface a candidate for deferral review.

03 · The team’s next action

The review team checks operating constraints and inspection requirements, then records the decision and follow-up for the next maintenance opportunity.

Focus the outage on necessary work, with a clear technical basis for what can wait.

Trusted By

7 Phases

From scoping to post-turnaround lessons

Eos

Agentic AI across the turnaround

One Shared Workspace

Owners, planners and contractors

Why STOs still feel like chaos,
even with tools

Safety-critical work, simultaneous operations, regulatory obligations and contractor mobilization converge in one outage window. Disconnected records make it harder to see which gap needs action now.

Fragmented Truth

Scope, schedules, materials and contractor status sit in separate records. The team spends review time reconciling them.

Learning Leakage

Lessons are documented after each turnaround, but are hard to retrieve when the next scope or work pack is reviewed.

Readiness Gaps

A job is scheduled before its permits, access, resources, materials or isolation requirements are confirmed.

Scope Drift

Scope is frozen on paper and keeps moving in practice. Each addition looks reasonable; together, they change the outage.

Rear-View Reporting

Status is assembled by hand and presented hours later. Reviews spend too much time establishing what has changed.

Uniform Urgency

A long list of overdue items competes for attention. The team needs to understand which gaps threaten readiness or the finish date.
The Missing Connection

Connect the data. Understand the consequence. Own the next action.

What changes with TA Orchestrator

One operating picture across systems and workfronts, with the context to act—and history the next turnaround can use.

01

AI-Driven Insights

Eos connects data to jobs and equipment, creates actionables and uses Inclusion Factor (IF) Score to suggest scope inclusion, review or deferral.

02

Unified Digital Ecosystem

Owners and contractors coordinate updates, reviews and action follow-up in a shared workspace connected to the turnaround’s source records.

03

Live Execution Monitoring

Bring contractor and engineer updates together with camera-observed milestones, where visibility allows, to keep field progress in view.

04

Measured Readiness

Compare actual readiness with the plan by phase and criterion. Drill into incomplete criteria and related actionables to focus the readiness review.

05

Governed Scope

Review the basis for including, deferring or rejecting work. Make changes visible and retain the decisions behind the scope baseline.

06

Compounding Memory

Keep past event records and lessons linked to relevant equipment and work, so the next review starts with accessible operating history.

One modular offering, seven phases of value

Scope, plan, schedule, procure, prepare, execute and learn. Connected workflows support the turnaround lifecycle; readiness gates and their timing follow your site’s plan.

01

Scope: Baseline

Bring scope inputs into one register. Eos maps inspection findings, maintenance history and previous learnings to the relevant equipment and jobs, and surfaces Inclusion Factor (IF) Score with inclusion reasoning.

This hybrid score suggests whether scope should be included, reviewed or deferred as the team works toward scope freeze.
See why a scope is a deferral candidate.
Review its IF Score alongside inspection findings, operating conditions and maintenance history.

Keep the inclusion or deferral decision and its technical basis visible through scope freeze.

02

Plan: Work packs

Turn frozen scope into draft technical work packs. Eos assembles job scope, task lists and equipment specifications so planners can review and develop the pack for execution.

03

Schedule: Alignment

Bring tasks, durations and dependencies into an aligned plan. Review missing predecessor or successor links in the schedule register, resolve planning gaps and optimize against a norms-based benchmark plan before execution begins.

04

Procure: Readiness

Follow requisitions, orders and material readiness against the work they support. Surface stalled approvals, unplaced long-lead orders and delivery gaps. Monitor overall spend vs budget, alongside receipt, inspection, preservation and service mobilization.
Procurement & Contracts
Control valves required across 13 units. Technical approval pending. No PO placed.
Eos brings the requisition status and affected work into view. Procurement and the requesting engineer can resolve the approval blocker, agree the PO target and test it against supplier lead time and the required-on-site date. After award, the team tracks inspection and delivery commitments.

05

Prepare: Gate Reviews

Measure preparedness against the milestones in your turnaround plan. Compare planned and actual readiness by phase, unit and criterion. Bring incomplete prerequisites, open risks and mitigation actions into the gate review.

06

Execute: Control

Measure planned versus actual progress during the turnaround. Use the S-curve and execution views to see where work is falling behind, drill into the affected jobs and focus the next shift’s actions. Bring hazards, inspection findings and resource utilization into the same execution review.

Milestone Tracking

Execution Tracking

07

Learn: Post-turnaround lessons

Retain previous turnaround reports, inspection findings, execution records and lessons in a searchable history. Bring that context into the next scope review and work-pack draft, turn recurring issues into risk mitigation actions, and use actual experience to refine planning assumptions.

The Platform

Eos is the agentic AI behind the orchestrator

One agentic AI across the turnaround, from reviewing scope to investigating execution gaps.

Start with the issue.
Follow it to the work.

Across every phase, Eos maps the turnaround’s information to jobs and equipment, surfaces what needs attention and helps your team investigate the details through conversation.
Map relevant data to jobs and equipment.
Create actionables for the team to review.
Use Inclusion Factor scoring to support scope optimization.
Draft technical work packs from frozen scope.

Explore a conversation with Eos

Long-lead valve procurement
You

Which long-lead valve requisitions still have no purchase order?

Eos

A requisition for control valves and on-off valves is awaiting technical evaluation approval. No purchase order is recorded.

The approval and order-placement status need attention before the team can confirm material availability against the turnaround plan.

01

TA Orchestrator for Refining

Scope governance, work-pack drafting, procurement, preparedness and execution in a shared platform built around refinery turnaround workflows and oil & gas equipment context.

02

TA Orchestrator for Steel

Multi-unit, anticipatory turnaround optimization built for integrated steel plants, sequencing work across the whole plant at once.

01

Scope Management

Unify scope inputs, review equipment context and Inclusion Factor reasoning, and govern scope decisions through staged approvals. Generate draft technical work packs from frozen scope.

02

Planning & Estimating

Develop estimates and align tasks, durations and dependencies in the planning schedule. Resolve planning gaps and optimize against a norms-based benchmark plan.

03

Procurement & Contracts

Track requisitions, orders and material readiness against the jobs they support, including long-lead requirements. Monitor overall spend vs budget, inspection, preservation and service mobilization.

04

Preparedness Tracker

Compare planned and actual readiness by phase, unit and criterion. Drill into unfinished prerequisites and the actions needed before each gate.

05

Risk Management

Assess likelihood and impact, compare exposure on a heatmap, and track responses, owners and dated mitigation actions against related work.

06

Learning

Keep turnaround reports, inspection findings and lessons searchable. Reuse equipment history to inform the next scope review and plan.

01

Progress Capture

Combine field updates and visible milestone monitoring. Compare planned and actual progress through the turnaround, then drill into the jobs behind each variance.

02

Hazard Detection

Use computer vision to flag visible safety risks from camera feeds, helping site teams review conditions and prioritize their response.

03

Inspection

Manage inspection calls, digital checklists, shift handover notes and issue logs together, keeping findings accessible to the execution team.

04

Inventory & Productivity

Track equipment, headcount and utilization to reveal productivity trends and support the team’s daily execution review.

Sits on top of what
you already run

Connect the records your turnaround depends on and map them to jobs and equipment. Start with agreed system exports, documents or APIs, then expand as the deployment requires.

Source-system ownership, refresh frequency and any write-back are defined with your IT team.

What holds the whole platform together

Safety-critical work, simultaneous operations, regulatory obligations and contractor mobilization converge in one outage window. Disconnected records make it harder to see which gap needs action now.

Shared operating context.

Owners and contractors work from connected registers, updates and turnaround KPIs.

Job and equipment mapping.

Eos relates source records to the work they support, making relevant context easier to find.

Digital review workflows

Keep scope decisions, inspection records, issues and follow-up actions accessible to the team.

Adoption alongside deployment

Align review cadence, responsibilities and data discipline through change-management support.

Reporting Automation

Bring daily and shift reporting together, with progress and variance context for the team’s review.

Contractor Collaboration

Give owners and contractors one workspace for field updates, reviews, actions and dashboards.

Common questions

What does Turnaround Orchestrator add to our existing workflow?

Turnaround Orchestrator brings connected job and equipment context, scope governance, preparedness reviews and execution monitoring into a shared workflow. Eos creates actionables, uses Inclusion Factor (IF) Score to suggest scope inclusion, review or deferral, and supports conversational drill-down, so a team can move from a readiness gap to an informed next action.

Do we need to replace SAP or Primavera?

No. The deployment is designed around the systems you already use. Agreed exports or APIs supply the relevant data, while your team defines which system owns each record and how updates are reconciled.

How quickly can we see value?

Customers typically see value in under three months, starting with a focused release for one unit or use case, such as scope optimization or procurement readiness. We agree the inputs, review owners and success measures at the outset; timing depends on scope, data availability and integration needs.

Can this work across multiple refineries or plants?

Yes. T-Pulse TA Orchestrator supports deployment across multiple refineries and plants. Reuse data mappings, review structures and lessons across sites, while configuring each site’s asset hierarchy, readiness gates and workflows to its operating context.

Do we need perfect data to start?

No. Start with the records needed for a specific workflow: a scope register, equipment references, a baseline schedule or procurement status. Mapping and data-quality gaps need to be made visible and resolved with the data owners as coverage grows.

Which systems and historical records can be included?

Deployment scope can include ERP and CMMS records, P6 or MS Project schedules, risk-based inspection (RBI) and management-of-change (MOC) data, and contractor or tender records. Where a system is not in place, Excel registers, inspection reports and other documents can provide the starting inputs. Previous turnaround reports and executed schedules can supply historical context. Confirm source formats, access and integration requirements during discovery.

Can we configure gate timelines for our site?

Yes. Default readiness gates provide a starting structure. Gates and their timing are configured during deployment to match your turnaround plan, and readiness is measured against that plan. The seven workflows on this page describe lifecycle coverage; the dashboard’s gate grouping follows the site configuration.

What does AI prepare, and what does the team approve?

Eos generates actionables, supports investigation and drafts technical work packs from frozen scope. Your team reviews the technical content, completes the customer’s format and clauses, and retains approval authority. Visual milestone observations support progress monitoring; inspection acceptance and operating decisions remain with authorized personnel.

Stay ahead of shutdowns, turnarounds, & outages with T-Pulse TA Orchestrator.

Explore how Eos connects turnaround information to the actions your team needs to take. Book a demo or a readiness diagnostic scoped to one unit or workfront.
Solutions Needed
Captcha